So, last night was full of incredible amusement at the response of twitter to some causal racism and an attempt at using humor to describe, you know, the deaths of literally hundreds of thousands of adults and children due to an illness affecting millions of people in South Africa.
The offending tweet:
So, we’ve done this dance before. Someone tweets something insufferably demeaning and stupid and all hell is unleashed. And yeah, I’m very much down with that.
Framing what happened, in its entirety, as twitter “turned ugly” is ignoring how satisfying it is to make someone accountable for insulting and belittling the suffering of others; and ignoring how many people turned the anger into a positive force.
It wasn’t “ugly” – it was pretty damned brilliant.
Well – for the most part.
To me – the sting of her comment was not real. One of my students, long ago, recounted her experiences in South Africa as a volunteer working with populations devastated by HIV/AIDS. That’s as close as I get.
That’s all.
I have the privilege of being able to look at her tweet with an academic detachment; knowing that I do not live with a constant fear of violence, that I have valid information concerning my health, and that I have access to (and am literally blocks from) the best health care on earth.
I realize that frame of mind makes it easier for me to view these responses as inappropriate.
So, I wonder. How would I react? What would I say if someone just made a smug joke about the suffering of my community – the deaths of my family – possibly my own children?
(I’m also not the person receiving rape and death threats over a tweet, am I?)
I can wrap my brain around these statements being made from a profound sense of loss and anger – but there are limits – and the supposed “mindless twitter mob” was making that clear.
There is also this thing that happens when a woman is targeted – rightly or wrongly. The misogynist assholes see blood in the water and come out to play. It doesn’t matter the nature of the infraction, the subject at hand, or what the hell is going on – only that she is a woman. They must take this opportunity to eviscerate her and let everyone know that the status of women is less-than.
And yeah, I don’t know Eric here – for all I know he’s a *Really Great Guy* who simply uses belittling sexist language occasionally. It happens.
And in the sea of sexist insults: “sweetheart” “honey” “cunt” “bitch”; I found this statement.
Tell me again, how rape culture doesn’t exist.
[Update: This post is being linked by others to show samples of the types of threats that Justine received. Here is a comment I made on one of those blogs:
Seriously – that wasn’t the half of it. I went through to put a bunch of accounts on the Bot; and had to quit at some point because it was making me feel uncomfortable reading all that shit.
I can only imagine what it may have felt like for Justine.
And yes, this does have to do with her gender. This would not happen to a man.
Because she is an affluent white woman; there is this license to be awful due to the concept that the mob is “punching up”, but at the same time, because she is a woman, there is a deep seeded social imperative to humiliate her and put her in her place.
FFS there were people out-and-out calling for rape to re-establish the male-female social order; fucking pieces of shit.
Bringing her to task for being so flippant – that was honestly amusing. But yeah, apparently we can’t do that without violent rapist assholes showing up and being violent rapist assholes.]
M Innes (Cybersmith) said:
I thought “Honey” had become a gender-nuetral term? Although I suppose Iwould feel weird calling a fellow bloke “Honey” so you may be correct. In any case, her statements would best be countered by a link to the wikipedia pageon HIV/Aids. Knowledge is always beter than scorn, whichwill simply make her defensive, and thus she will probably tweet additional rude content.
M. A. Melby said:
Scorn is more effective than attempting knowledge-transmission when the problem is being so entitled as to believe yourself untouchable and immune to suffering consequences for harming others or treating them with intense disrespect.
Pingback: news: ” I am Against mob-lynching .. for any reasons, anywhere, any time ” Period. #againsttwits | " Un si long Voyage "
Pingback: What Did Our Outrage at Justine Sacco Actually Accomplish? – Flavorwire
M Innes (Cybersmith) said:
Well, she was fired when she landed, so it seems that the balestorm was successful, but it would have been more ethical to wait until she landed, as the attacks whilst she was separated from the world wide web, effectively tried her in her absence.
Jessica said:
That one guy who spoke about correctional rape actually mentions his beloved baby daughter in his bio! Boggles the mind.
M. A. Melby said:
We rarely see the connection between perpetuating toxic norms with others as targets – and those same social licenses being turned back on us and the people we love.
Iamcuriousblue said:
But I suppose if the threats were of non-sexual violence and the target was a man, that would be totally OK, right?
M. A. Melby said:
No.
Tauriq Moosa said:
Note: You’ve been referenced in the NY Times: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/24/is-the-internet-a-mob-without-consequence/?hp&_r=0 Congrats.
M. A. Melby said:
You too! In fact, I’m thinking that my blog was picked up from your blog – so – thanks!
Tauriq Moosa said:
I’m almost certain that’s the case. If so, it’s the best Christmas present I’ve ever given. No one can say I’m not nice now!
M. A. Melby said:
Who says you are not nice?
And yes…thank you. 🙂
Pingback: Is the Internet a Mob Without Consequence? – New York Times (blog) – blog – Google News | News Magazine Blog
Pingback: Is the Internet a Mob Without Consequence? | Social Network News
Pingback: Look Who’s Gawking: Inside Nick Denton’s phony, hypocritical class war against tech workers | PandoDaily
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob | EnewsPot
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob | [ mukeshbalani.com ]
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob | Go to News!
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob | Noticias de Paraguay
Pingback: Claire Ann Peetz Blog Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob - Claire Ann Peetz Blog
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob : REPORTCOIN
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob | We Report
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob – JUANMONEGRO.COM
Pingback: Today in Technology December 27, 2013 | Tech Fann.com
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob | MedeTube
Pingback: Why We Should All Fear The Righteous Online Mob - The Morning News
david karchem said:
Humans often demonstrate ignorant, irrational [ack of intelligence and mob mentality. Whether sexuslly repressive rape threats or dumb “white cracker” comments, mobs allow ignorance and stupidity to reign. Remember humans are the only animal that kills for sport – as if using a rifle with telescopic site demonstrates “superior” skills – or sporting abilities better than the target wolf, bear, lion, deer,whale,dolphin, or other living creature. Perhaps when they’ve eliminated every other living creature, they’ll hunt each other? This might reduce the ignorance-deficient part of the population that goes into mob mentslity.
Stephen Emhecht said:
Why are you trying to make her out to be the victim?
M. A. Melby said:
Humans are not the only animals that kill for sport. You must not own cats.
Not really digging the Social Darwin-esque Misanthropy – but carry on.
M. A. Melby said:
*sigh* I’m going to assume that your question is actually a statement, and that you are annoyed that I’ve empathized with someone who has said extremely problematic things and have avoided demonizing her to the point where threats of rape and death from people who were being given her location is somehow justified.
Might I suggest that yours is the mentality that allows for torture, murder and rape of criminals; and that the black-and-white world of victims and oppressor / hero and villain isn’t actually the world we currently live in.
Dehumanizing our enemy to the point where all punishment is socially sanctioned is a source of incredible evil in the world.
Does that answer your “question”?
Socratic Method Man said:
You’re absolutely correct. There is no crime, no disrespect, no act that justifies rape threats. The concept of punitive rape suggests that a rapist can perform an assault that somehow ceases to be a crime because it’s on someone who “deserves” it.
People believe prison rape is just punishment for crimes, but have apparently never asked themselves (1) how their belief that rape is a good thing harms our culture, (2) what the rapists in jail did that was so super good that you’re granting them an endless supply of rape victims, or (3) what that will mean when those rapists are released from prison.
The same goes for torture and murder, though those don’t have quite the same white-knuckle wish-fulfilment misogyny and facile dehumanisation of criminals that rape does.
If you can’t punish people for doing wrong without capering around with glee that someone has given you a target for your nonconsent fantasies, you have fucking ZERO moral high ground from which to pretend you can dish out discipline, punishment, or punitive correction.
Sally Strange (@SallyStrange) said:
LOL, what happened, iamcuriousblue? Your trolling mojo has grown weak.
Pingback: The Curse of Social Media | Australian Missionary
Pingback: Linkspam: 01/03/14 — The Radish.
Pingback: Picking on your battles | SINMANTYX
Pingback: On Social Media, Some Are Susceptible to Internet Outrage | Tsangg
Pingback: Clicking Their Way to Outrage – New York Times – internet – Google News | Blog Online
Pingback: What Are We Angry About Today? | Social Dashboard
mark said:
I know im a year late… but, flippant as the comment may be, what is the indication that this Justine woman is truly a careless racist scumbag? Sarcasm and satire are legitimate forms of shorthand critique… I haven’t looked into who she is or why she was there (she could have been there for AIDS activism, or to murder rhinos for all anyone knew when they jumped on her). But there are two options here…either she is a callous fool, or the entire internet made the same mistake as innocent text messagers across the world: not recognizing sarcasm. There is something incredibly destructive about people acting like a mob and destroying someones life over something that may be nothing more than weakly executed sarcasm and mob rule becoming fascist in its antifascism. Its like south park…while not the pinnacle of academic social critique, most people can watch it and recognize that most of the crudeness is DIRECTLY CRITICIZING those who genuinely hold those cruse beliefs.
The difference is that there is no punctuation that indicates sarcasm, satire, or the intention of mocking the very thing one is pretending to mimic.
Social justice is incredibly important. But devolution into mob rule, condemnation and execution without trial….and as much as anything, the potential death of sarcasm as a mode of critique….are all terrible casualties of a sometimes single minded quest to point out and stamp out the injustices that people see everywhere. USUALLY those injustices are real and not imagined. But are you willing to bet an entire mode of governance on gut reactions?
Sarcasm often does more to demoralize the “enemy” and build comradery than any amount of academic critique or emotional outpouring. The death of sarcasm and the devolution of social justice activism to mob mentalities, if left unchecked, will surely (and very sadly) be its undoing.
Pingback: Is Free Speech Being Murdered By The Internet?
Pingback: Internet Stalkers Can Ruin Your Life – The Debbie Daily Wishes You A Happy New Year